4.6 Article

Efficient collection of viable virus aerosol through laminar-flow, water-based condensational particle growth

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 3, Pages 805-815

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jam.13051

Keywords

amplification; bacteriophage MS2; collection efficiency; infectious viruses; viability

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IDBR-1353423]
  2. Aerosol Dynamics Inc.
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences
  4. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1353423] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsState-of-the-art bioaerosol samplers have poor collection efficiencies for ultrafine virus aerosols. This work evaluated the performance of a novel growth tube collector (GTC), which utilizes laminar-flow water-based condensation to facilitate particle growth, for the collection of airborne MS2 viruses. Methods and ResultsFine aerosols (<500nm) containing MS2 coliphage were generated from a Collison nebulizer, conditioned by a dilution dryer and collected by a GTC and a BioSampler. The GTC effectively condensed water vapour onto the virus particles, creating droplets 2-5m in diameter, which facilitated collection. Comparison of particle counts upstream and downstream revealed that the GTC collected >93% of the inlet virus particles, whereas the BioSampler's efficiency was about 10%. Viable counts of the GTC-collected viruses were also one order of magnitude higher than those of the BioSampler (P=0003). ConclusionThe efficiency of the GTC for the viable collection of MS2 viruses exceeds that of industry standard instrument, the BioSampler, by a factor of 10-100. Significance and Impact of the StudyThis study reveals that the GTC is an effective collector of viable MS2 aerosols, and concludes the instrument will be an effective tool for studying viable virus aerosols and the inhalation risks posed by airborne viruses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available