4.4 Article

Evaluation of correlation between intrafractional residual setup errors and accumulation of delivered dose distributions in single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy for multiple brain metastases

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.04.012

Keywords

Multiple brain metastases; Stereotactic radiotherapy; Residual setup error; Volumetric modulated arc therapy; Dose distribution

Funding

  1. JSPS [JP20K16723, JP21K15548]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the displacement of gross tumor volume (GTV) positions in fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (f-SRT) with single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (SI-VMAT) for multiple brain metastases. The study found no significant difference in GTV dose distribution, despite GTVs being far from the isocenter, likely due to the reduction of intrafractional residual setup errors to a clinically acceptable level.
Purpose: To evaluate the displacement of gross tumor volume (GTV) positions caused by intrafractional residual setup errors (RSEs) and to accumulate delivered dose distributions considering intrafraction RSEs in fractionatedstereotactic radiotherapy (f-SRT) with single isocenter volumetric modulated arc therapy (SI-VMAT) for multiple brain metastases.Methods: Overall, 72 consecutive patients who underwent f-SRT with SI-VMAT for multiple brain metastases were included. For all patients, 6D correction was performed using the ExacTrac X-ray (ETX) system. GTV displacement (AD) was calculated considering the intrafractional RSEs measured by the ETX system during irradiation. The correlation between AD and the distance from the isocenter to each GTV (d) was analyzed. Computed tomography (CT) images considering the intrafractional RSEs were generated for five patients with AD > 1 mm. The delivered dose distributions for all fractions were reconstructed on the corresponding CT, followed by their accumulation.Results: The 95th percentile of AD from 7,270 resultant center positions of 417 GTVs was 0.92 mm. No correlation was observed between AD and d. For 53 GTVs from five patients with AD > 1 mm, the difference of GTV D99.5% and D0.5% between the planned and accumulated values was -0.4 +/- 2.5% and -1.0 +/- 0.8%, respectively. There was no correlation between d and the difference of GTV D99.5% and D0.5%.Conclusions: We found no significant difference in GTV D99.5% and D0.5%, despite the location of GTVs far from the isocenter. However, it should be noted that this result was because the intrafractional RSEs were reduced to a clinically acceptable level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available