4.3 Article

EVALUATING THE 3D INTEGRITY OF UNDERWATER STRUCTURE FROM MOTION WORKFLOWS

Journal

PHOTOGRAMMETRIC RECORD
Volume 37, Issue 177, Pages 35-60

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phor.12399

Keywords

3D modelling; benthic monitoring; data quality; glass sponge; marine ecology; structure from motion

Funding

  1. Mitacs [IT10019]
  2. Ocean Wise and Vancouver Aquarium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper explores the application of SfM in temperate waters, evaluating the impact of water temperature, underwater cameras, and photograph quantity and configuration on SfM accuracy through a series of experiments. The results show that underwater SfM workflows can generate highly accurate 3D models in temperate waters.
Structure from motion (SfM) is an accessible and non-intrusive method of three-dimensional (3D) data capture popular for tropical coral reef surveying. In the north-east Pacific Ocean, where there are many environmentally sensitive benthic organisms whose morphology and function are equally important, SfM surveys are less commonly studied. Temperate waters pose unique challenges to SfM workflows, which must be systematically unpacked to understand their impact on data quality and veracity. This uncertainty raises broader questions concerning SfM as a spatial data-acquisition and ecological characterisation method in temperate waters, and whether a systematic workflow assessment reveals vital relationships between SfM implementation parameters, 3D data products and their implications for underwater SfM surveys. This paper, the second of two empirical assessments, reports on a series of wet-lab and dryland tests quantifying the impact that temperate waters, underwater cameras, and photograph quantity and configuration have on SfM accuracy. These tests provided crucial accuracy benchmarks informing subsequent field-based surveys and revealed that underwater SfM workflows can generate highly accurate 3D models in temperate waters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available