4.5 Article

Effect of eight-week online cognitive training in Parkinson's disease: A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial

Journal

PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages 80-87

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2022.02.018

Keywords

Parkinson's disease; Cognitive training; RCT; Cognitive impairment; Dementia; Cognitive rehabilitation

Funding

  1. Dutch Parkinson's Disease Patient Association [2015-R04]
  2. Netherlands Brain Foundation [HA-2017-00227]
  3. ZonMw-Memorabel [73305095003]
  4. Gieskes-Strijbis Foundation
  5. Alzheimer's Society in the Netherlands
  6. Brain Foundation Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found no beneficial effect of eight-week computerized cognitive training on the primary outcome (planning accuracy) and only minor improvements on secondary outcomes (processing speed) with limited clinical impact.
Introduction: Cognitive training (CT) has been proposed as a treatment option for cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease (PD). We aimed to assess the efficacy of adaptive, computerized CT on cognitive function in PD. Methods: In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial we enrolled PD patients that experienced substantial subjective cognitive complaints. Over a period of eight weeks, participants underwent 24 sessions of computerized multi-domain CT or an active control intervention for 45 min each (randomized 1:1). The primary outcome was the accuracy on the Tower of London task; secondary outcomes included effects on other neuropsychological outcomes and subjective cognitive complaints. Outcomes were assessed before and after training and at six-months follow-up, and analyzed with multivariate mixed-model analyses. Results: The intention-to-treat population consisted of 136 participants (n = 68 vs. n = 68, age M: 62.9y, female: 39.7%). Multivariate mixed-model analyses showed no group difference on the Tower of London accuracy corrected for baseline performance (n = 130): B: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.15, p = 0.562. Participants in the CT group were on average 0.30 SD (i.e., 1.5 s) faster on difficulty load 4 of this task (secondary outcome): 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.06, p = 0.015. CT did not reduce subjective cognitive complaints. At follow-up, no group differences were found. Conclusions: This study shows no beneficial effect of eight-week computerized CT on the primary outcome (i.e., planning accuracy) and only minor improvements on secondary outcomes (i.e., processing speed) with limited clinical impact. Personalized or ecologically valid multi-modal intervention methods could be considered to achieve clinically meaningful and lasting effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available