4.3 Review

Malaria diagnostic methods with the elimination goal in view

Journal

PARASITOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 121, Issue 7, Pages 1867-1885

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-022-07512-9

Keywords

Malaria; RDT; Diagnostics; Elimination; Microscopy; Surveillance; Vaccine

Categories

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (NRF) South Africa [120368]
  2. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) [120368] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proper diagnosis is crucial for malaria control. Various diagnostic techniques have been used with different outcomes. As the elimination goal intensifies, there is a need for ideal, simple, fast, and reliable point-of-care diagnostic tools.
Malaria control measures have been in use for years but have not completely curbed the spread of infection. Ultimately, global elimination is the goal. A major playmaker in the various approaches to reaching the goal is the issue of proper diagnosis. Various diagnostic techniques were adopted in different regions and geographical locations over the decades, and these have invariably produced diverse outcomes. In this review, we looked at the various approaches used in malaria diagnostics with a focus on methods favorably used during pre-elimination and elimination phases as well as in endemic regions. Microscopy, rapid diagnostic testing (RDT), loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP), and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are common methods applied depending on prevailing factors, each with its strengths and limitations. As the drive toward the elimination goal intensifies, the search for ideal, simple, fast, and reliable point-of-care diagnostic tools is needed more than ever before to be used in conjunction with a functional surveillance system supported by the ideal vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available