4.6 Article

Rethinking the definition of chronic postsurgical pain: composites of patient-reported pain-related outcomes vs pain intensities alone

Journal

PAIN
Volume 163, Issue 12, Pages 2457-2465

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002653

Keywords

CPSP; ICD-11 code; Pain-related affective interference; Pain-related functional interference; Pre-existing chronic pain; Risk factors

Funding

  1. European Community
  2. European Society of Anaesthesiology
  3. Foundation Research in Anesthesia [223590]
  4. Intensive Care Medicine of Bern University Hospital
  5. EU
  6. DFG
  7. BMBF
  8. EFIC
  9. Pfizer
  10. Mundipharma
  11. Gruenenthal
  12. European Community
  13. European Society of Anaesthesiology
  14. Foundation Research in Anesthesia
  15. Intensive Care Medicine of Bern University Hospital
  16. EU
  17. DFG
  18. BMBF
  19. EFIC
  20. Pfizer
  21. Mundipharma
  22. Gruenenthal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the incidence of Chronic Postsurgical Pain (CPSP) by combining pain intensity and pain-related interference with function in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). A more comprehensive assessment of pain and interference resulted in lower CPSP rates than previously reported.
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is defined by pain intensity and pain-related functional interference. This study included measures of function in a composite score of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to investigate the incidence of CPSP. Registry data were analyzed for PROs 1 day and 12 months postoperatively. Based on pain intensity and pain-related interference with function, patients were allocated to the groups CPSPF (at least moderate pain with interference), mixed (milder symptoms), and no CPSPF. The incidence of CPSPF was compared with CPSP rates referring to published data. Variables associated with the PRO-12 score (composite PROs at 12 months; numeric rating scale 0-10) were analyzed by linear regression analysis. Of 2319 patients, 8.6%, 32.5%, and 58.9% were allocated to the groups CPSPF, mixed, and no CPSPF, respectively. Exclusion of patients whose pain scores did not increase compared with the preoperative status, resulted in a 3.3% incidence. Of the patients without pre-existing pain, 4.1% had CPSPF. Previously published pain cutoffs of numeric rating scale >0, >= 3, or >= 4, used to define CPSP, produced rates of 37.5%, 9.7%, and 5.7%. Pre-existing chronic pain, preoperative opioid medication, and type of surgery were associated with the PRO-12 score (all P < 0.05). Opioid doses and PROs 24 hours postoperatively improved the fit of the regression model. A more comprehensive assessment of pain and interference resulted in lower CPSP rates than previously reported. Although inclusion of CPSP in the ICD-11 is a welcome step, evaluation of pain characteristics would be helpful in differentiation between CPSPF and continuation of pre-existing chronic pain.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available