4.5 Review

Dilated cardiomyopathy as the initial presentation of Becker muscular dystrophy: a systematic review of published cases

Journal

ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02346-1

Keywords

Dilated cardiomyopathy; Becker muscular dystrophy; Heart failure; Systematic review

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Becker muscular dystrophy can present as idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in adulthood, typically in the third to fourth decades of life. Most patients initially present with congestive heart failure symptoms, and musculoskeletal symptoms may appear several years after the initial cardiac manifestations.
There are scarce publications regarding the presentation and outcome of Becker muscular dystrophy in adulthood when idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy is the initial disease manifestation. We performed a systematic review using Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Scopus to identify cases of adults with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy who were subsequently diagnosed with Becker muscular dystrophy from inception through August 2020. Six cases were found. We identified young males (Median age: 26 years) with Becker muscular dystrophy who first presented with dilated cardiomyopathy. Most patients initially presented with congestive heart failure symptoms (5/6, 83%), and had a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 23%. One case did have calf pseudohypertrophy. Musculoskeletal symptoms later appeared one to six years after the initial dilated cardiomyopathy presentation. Heart transplantation was the most common management strategy (4/6, 67%). A left ventricular assist device was used in one case as a bridge to heart transplant. Dilated cardiomyopathy can be the initial presentation of Becker muscular dystrophy in the third to fourth decades of life in adult patients, and musculoskeletal symptoms can be subclinical.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available