4.6 Review

Analytical Tools Integrated in Continuous-Flow Reactors: Which One for What?

Journal

ORGANIC PROCESS RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 1766-1793

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.oprd.2c00102

Keywords

automation; chemistry 4.0; continuous-flow reactor; flow chemistry; in-line/online analysis

Funding

  1. Nantes Universite
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. NExT
  4. Region des Pays de la Loire
  5. Nantes Metropole

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept and practices of chemical synthesis are transforming towards fully autonomous continuous processes, which require efficient monitoring and online analysis. This review presents the main in-line/online analytical tools for monitoring chemical reactions, serving as a guide for synthetic chemists.
The concept and practices of chemical synthesis are being profoundly transformed toward the development of fully autonomous continuous processes. Critical to the development of autonomous continuous processes is the efficient monitoring of the reaction composition and product quality by in-line and online analyses. The in-line/online acquisition of analytical data allows one to monitor at regular intervals the reaction composition, including hazardous or air-sensitive intermediates with the possibility of adapting reaction parameters or interrupting the flow process when a chemical or technical failure is detected. This review presents the main in-line/online analytical tools that can be integrated into flow reactors for the monitoring of chemical reactions. This contribution is more a guide at the service of synthetic chemists illustrated by selected published examples from leading research laboratories than an exhaustive list of published articles. Ultimately, we would like this review to be an answer to the following recurrent, yet complex, question: Which is/are the most suitable analytical solution(s) to monitor my chemical reaction?.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available