4.7 Article

In situ apatite U-Pb dating for the ophiolite-hosted Nianzha orogenic gold deposit, Southern Tibet

Journal

ORE GEOLOGY REVIEWS
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104811

Keywords

Apatite; U-Pb dating; Trace element geochemistry; Orogenic gold deposit; Southern Tibet

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91855213, 41972070, 41672071, 41602067, U1302233]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Cen-tral Universities [18lgpy25]
  3. National Key Research and Develop-ment Program of China [2018YFC0603603, 2018YFA0702605]
  4. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011922]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the apatite in the Nianzha gold deposit and identifies two types of apatite, indicating different formation processes. The dating of hydrothermal apatite provides valuable information on the timing of orogenic gold mineralization events in the region.
Mineralization age dating is essential for understanding orogenic-type gold metallogeny, but suitable minerals for dating are not always available. Apatite can incorporate considerable amount of U and Th, making it a potential U-Pb geochronometer to study hydrothermal alteration and mineralization processes. The newlydiscovered Nianzha is a large orogenic Au deposit (~25 t @ 3.08 g/t Au) and located in the contact fault zone between ultramafic rocks and diorite in the Renbu tectonic me ' lange of southern Tibet. Two different types of apatite were identified in the Nianzha gold deposit: type I magmatic apatite hosted in diorite and syenite, and intergrown with other magmatic minerals; type II hydrothermal apatite hosted in mineralized diorite. These apatite grains are coarse euhedral granular and closely associated with auriferous sulfides (e.g., pyrite, chalcopyrite, galena). Type I apatite is F- and SO3-rich, whereas type II apatite is distinct from type I apatite by its significantly higher Cl, Mn, rare earth elements (REE), U, Th, and As contents, indicative of a hydrothermal origin. Thus, formation age of type II apatite reflects the timing of gold mineralization. Two type I magmatic apatite samples yielded similar discordia U-Pb ages of 80.35 +/- 1.56 Ma (MSWD = 1.3; n = 86) and 79.53 +/- 1.27 Ma (MSWD = 0.91; n = 72), respectively, whilst type II hydrothermal apatite yielded a discordia age of 44.60 +/- 1.45 Ma (MSWD = 1.2; n = 64). The gold mineralization age is consistent with that of nearby orogenic gold deposits (e.g., Mayum, Bangbu, Zhemulang, and Juqu) in the region. Therefore, we suggest that hydrothermal apatite U-Pb dating can effectively constrain the timing of orogenic Au mineralization events.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available