4.6 Article

Clinical outcomes of patients with pT4a and pT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma who had undergone surgery: Results from a Taiwanese registry-based, nationwide cohort study

Journal

ORAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 126, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105750

Keywords

Oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma; pT4b tumor; Cancer Registry; Propensity score matching; Survival outcomes

Funding

  1. Chang Gung Medical Foundation [CMRPD1H0521, BMRPC55]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with pT4a and pT4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) who had undergone surgical treatment. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in outcomes were observed between pT4a and pT4b OCSCC. Positive margins may be the main factor driving the survival difference between T4a and T4b tumors. It is suggested that surgical excision should be considered as initial treatment for T4b OCSCC if feasible.
Objectives: While the NCCN guidelines maintain that T4b oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) should undergo either non-surgical treatments or clinical trials, promising outcomes of T4b OCSCC having surgical excision have been reported. We analyzed and compared the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with pT4a and pT4b OCSCC who had undergone surgical treatment. Methods: From 2011 to 2017, a total of 4031 and 355 patients with first primary pT4a and pT4b OCSCC were identified. A propensity score (PS)-matched analysis of patients (n = 351 each) for pT4a and pT4b tumors was also performed. Results: The 5-year disease-specific and overall survival (DSS/OS) rates were more favorable in patients with pT4a than in those with pT4b OCSCC (64%/55%, p < 0.0001; 55%/43%, p < 0.0001, respectively). Compared with pT4a, those with pT4b tumors had a higher burden of the following risk factors: buccal/retromolar/hard palate subsite, male sex, depth >= 10 mm, and positive margins. Before PS matching, multivariable analyses revealed that pT4b tumors (versus pT4a) were an adverse prognosticator for both 5-year DSS and OS (hazard ratios: 1.32 and 1.39, respectively). However, in the PS-matched cohort, no significant differences in 5-year DSS and OS rates were observed between pT4a and pT4b OCSCC (57%/56%, p = 0.4024; 48%/44%, p = 0.1807, respectively) Conclusions: No significant outcome differences were evident between pT4b and pT4a OCSCC after PS matching. The most plausible hypothesis for the observed survival difference between T4a and T4b tumors is that it was driven by positive margins. We suggest that T4b OCSCC should undergo initial surgical excision if adequate resection is possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available