4.7 Article

The rebound effect in transportation

Journal

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2021.102563

Keywords

Transportation; Traveling-purchaser-problem; Rebound Effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research shows that measures taken to increase resource efficiency may lead to rebound effects due to entities' reactions to environmental changes. This paper examines the potential rebound effects in the logistics sector by studying a TPP transport network and analyzing different parameterizations of the environment to determine the factors for the occurrence and magnitude of rebound effects. The study presents an upper bound on the number of rebound effects and demonstrates that increasing fuel efficiency in smaller steps may lead to backfires.
Sometimes measurements taken to increase resource efficiency do not reach the estimated magnitude, as part of the reduction vanishes due to the reaction of entities to the changed environment. This socalled rebound effect is intensively discussed in the energy sector literature. Surprisingly, little is found for transportation, and the question arises whether rebound effects occur in logistics as well. In this paper, we fill this gap by examining a Traveling Purchaser Problem (TPP) transport network. The implementation, which is a generalization of the TSP, will serve as a decision space in which the procurement of various quantities of products inside a logistics network will be optimized in regard to total costs while the consumption of fuel is monitored. Different parameterizations of the environment will be analyzed and tested to determine factors for the occurrence and magnitude of rebound effects. We present an upper bound on the number of rebound effects and we prove that smaller steps in fuel efficiency increase let each rebound effect become a backfire. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available