4.7 Article

Application of rigid-plastic theory method in ship-ice collision

Journal

OCEAN ENGINEERING
Volume 253, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2022.111237

Keywords

Ship-ice collision; Rigid-plastic theory; Ice crushing; Plastic damage; Comparisons

Funding

  1. High-tech Ship Projects of the Ministry of Industry and Information Tech-nology [MC-201918-C10]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019-YB-013]
  3. program of China Scholarship Council (CSC) [201906950096]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11972269]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper introduces a method of applying the rigid-plastic theory to ship-ice collision and predicting plastic damage caused by energy dissipation during ice impact. The analytical results show good correlations with experimental and numerical results, accurately predicting maximal collision forces and plastic deformations of ship plates.
The rigid-plastic theory is widely used to estimate structural plastic damage in ship collision and some other structural impact cases under the assumption that the impactor is an idealized rigid body. This paper aims to extend the rigid-plastic method in ship collision to ship-ice collision, considering the energy dissipation caused by ice failure in the collision process. Based on three types of assumed collision scenarios between ship plates and ice floes, an approximate analytical plastic damage prediction method for ship plate impacted by ice floe is proposed, combining the rigid-plastic theory method with the energy approach of ice crushing. The analytical results have good correlations with experimental and numerical results in predicting maximal collision forces, plastic deformations of plate and so on. The proposed analytical formulations can provide a useful and conve-nient tool for the estimation of plastic damage of ship plates subjected to ice floe impact.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available