4.2 Article

Update to the pediatric Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA)

Journal

NUTRITION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 1448-1457

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10859

Keywords

children; length; malnutrition; nutrition assessment; pediatrics; weight

Funding

  1. Canadian Nutrition Society

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The lack of a standardized method for identifying and defining pediatric malnutrition has hindered the understanding of its prevalence and impact. This study proposes updates to the anthropometric section of the Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment tool to improve its clinical practicality and applicability. The analysis shows that these updates would not significantly affect the validity of the tool.
Lack of a standardized method of identifying and defining pediatric malnutrition has led to an inability to fully understand the prevalence of and impact that malnutrition has on pediatric patients and the healthcare system. The Subjective Global Nutritional Assessment (SGNA) is an assessment tool meant to determine presence and severity of malnutrition in pediatric populations. However, the anthropometric section of the tool contains some out-dated parameters. This has limited its clinical practicality. The aim of this paper is to propose updates to the anthropometrics section of the SGNA. A retrospective analysis of 153 SGNA's performed on children aged 1 month to 16 years was completed, comparing the original SGNA results to SGNA results incorporating updated anthropometric parameters for percentiles and ideal body weight. The category of length/height for age was updated to include z score cutoffs rather than percentiles, and ideal body weight was updated to z scores for weight for length or body mass index (BMI). Two serial growth questions were updated in wording only, to reflect z score trends. The results of the analysis showed these updates would have changed the rankings of eight patients (5%) for length/height for age, and 20 patients (13%) for ideal body weight to weight for length or BMI. Adjustments to these questions did not impact the overall SGNA rating. This study shows updates to the SGNA are not expected to have a significant impact on the validity of the tool and has the potential to improve its applicability to current day practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available