4.4 Article

Acceptance of e-health technology among older people: A qualitative study

Journal

NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 437-446

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12939

Keywords

culturally appropriate technology; health technology; home health monitoring; Indonesia; older people; primary health care

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Research and Technology/National Research and Innovation Agency [9/EI/KPT/2021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study utilized a qualitative approach to explore the acceptance and adoption of health technology among older people in primary health care centers. The findings revealed three main themes: the demand for care, resistance and openness towards technology, and a preference for home health monitoring.
E-health technology has been widely implemented in healthcare systems and has many benefits. However, available studies that focus on the acceptance and adoption of e-health technology, particularly among older people in primary care centers, are still limited. A qualitative approach was adopted in this study to explore the acceptability and adoption of health technology among older people who use primary health care. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 11 older people to gain in-depth insight into their perspectives on health technology. An inductive thematic analysis was conducted to gain insight from older people. Three main themes emerged: (1) demand of care refers a situation where participants realized that they had a health problem, sought ways to solve the health problem, and expected to be cared and monitored; (2) resistance and openness represent technology acceptance by older people; and (3) preference for home health monitoring: We found older people preferred home health monitoring in terms of comfort and ease of use. The study has provided important new knowledge in relation to acceptance and preference for health technology that currently exists, particularly among older people in Indonesia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available