4.8 Article

Enhanced nucleosome assembly at CpG sites containing an extended 5-methylcytosine analogue

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 50, Issue 11, Pages 6549-6561

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac444

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [315563949]
  2. Bavarian Ministry of Science and Art
  3. University of Regensburg
  4. European Research Council [ERC-AdG-2016/742654]
  5. Erasmus exchange Program
  6. Regensburg University Library

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methylation of cytosine is an important epigenetic mark that can alter DNA and chromatin structure. This study investigates how larger chemical variations in DNA affect chromatin structure and nucleosome formation.
Methylation of cytosine to 5-methylcytosine (mC) at CpG sites is a prevalent reversible epigenetic mark in vertebrates established by DNA methyltransferases (MTases); the attached methyl groups can alter local structure of DNA and chromatin as well as binding of dedicated proteins. Nucleosome assembly on methylated DNA has been studied extensively, however little is known how the chromatin structure is affected by larger chemical variations in the major groove of DNA. Here, we studied the nucleosome formation in vitro on DNA containing an extended 5mC analog, 5-(6-azidohex-2-ynyl)cytosine (ahyC) installed at biological relevant CpG sites. We found that multiple ahyC residues on 80-Widom and Hsp70 promoter DNA fragments proved compatible with nucleosome assembly. Moreover, unlike mC, ahyC increases the affinity of histones to the DNA, partially altering nucleosome positioning, stability, and the action of chromatin remodelers. Based on molecular dynamics calculations, we suggest that these new features are due to increased DNA flexibility at ahyC-modified sites. Our findings provide new insights into the biophysical behavior of modified DNA and open new ways for directed design of synthetic nucleosomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available