4.4 Article

Operational experience of the Belle II pixel detector

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2022.166631

Keywords

Belle II PXD; DEPFET; Pixel detector; Vertex detector

Funding

  1. MEXT (Japan)
  2. JSPS (Japan)
  3. MSMT (Czech Republic)
  4. GAUK (Czech Republic) [404316]
  5. MSCA-RISE project JENNIFER-2 (EU) [822070]
  6. WPI (Japan)
  7. Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany)
  8. Generalitat Valenciana (Spain) [CIDEGENT/2018/020]
  9. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11435013]
  10. University of Tabuk, KSA, Saudi Arabia [S-1440-0321, S-0256-1438, S-0280-1439]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Belle II experiment at the SuperKEKB accelerator has begun collecting physics data with its full detector setup. The Belle II pixel detector (PXD) plays a crucial role in tracking and vertexing and has shown good performance. However, operational challenges arise from the high background level produced by the SuperKEKB accelerator.
The Belle II experiment at the SuperKEKB accelerator has started its physics data taking with the full detector setup in March 2019. It aims to collect 40 times more e+e- collision data compared with its predecessor Belle experiment. The Belle II pixel detector (PXD) is based on the Depleted P-channel Field Effect Transistor (DEPFET) technology. The PXD plays an important role in the tracking and vertexing of the Belle II detector. Its two layers are arranged at radii of 14 mm and 22 mm around the interaction point. The sensors are thinned down to 75 mu m to minimize multiple scattering, and each module has interconnects and ASICs integrated on the sensor with silicon frames for mechanical support. PXD showed good performance during data taking. It also faces several operational challenges due to the high background level from the SuperKEKB accelerator, such as the damage from beam loss events, the drift in the HV working point due to radiation effect, and the impact of the high background.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available