Journal
NEW PHYTOLOGIST
Volume 235, Issue 6, Pages 2211-2222Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.18213
Keywords
allocation trade-offs; carbon allocation; common garden; growth; heritability; nonstructural carbohydrates; plasticity; storage
Categories
Funding
- US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Workforce Development for Teachers and Scientists, Office of Science Graduate Student Research (SCGSR) program
- National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1745303]
- Explorer's club
- Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU) [DE-SC0014664]
- Office of Biological and Environmental Research in the US Department of Energy Office of Science
- Harvard University Bullard Fellowship
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Trade-offs among carbon sinks constrain how trees respond to their environments. This study examines the relationship between growth and storage in trees using genetic and phenotypic data. The findings show that storage is actively accumulated at the expense of growth, both within and across species. This challenges the assumptions of passive storage in current ecosystem models.
Trade-offs among carbon sinks constrain how trees physiologically, ecologically, and evolutionarily respond to their environments. These trade-offs typically fall along a productive growth to conservative, bet-hedging continuum. How nonstructural carbohydrates (NSCs) stored in living tree cells (known as carbon stores) fit in this trade-off framework is not well understood. We examined relationships between growth and storage using both within species genetic variation from a common garden, and across species phenotypic variation from a global database. We demonstrate that storage is actively accumulated, as part of a conservative, bet-hedging life history strategy. Storage accumulates at the expense of growth both within and across species. Within the species Populus trichocarpa, genetic trade-offs show that for each additional unit of wood area growth (in cm(2) yr(-1)) that genotypes invest in, they lose 1.2 to 1.7 units (mg g(-1) NSC) of storage. Across species, for each additional unit of area growth (in cm(2) yr(-1)), trees, on average, reduce their storage by 9.5% in stems and 10.4% in roots. Our findings impact our understanding of basic plant biology, fit storage into a widely used growth-survival trade-off spectrum describing life history strategy, and challenges the assumptions of passive storage made in ecosystem models today.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available