4.7 Review

Sexual incentive motivation, sexual behavior, and general arousal: Do rats and humans tell the same story?

Journal

NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104595

Keywords

Sexual motivation; General arousal; Central motive state; Gonadal hormones; Pituitary hormones; Hypothalamic hormones; Transmitters; Dopamine; Orgasm; Genital arousal

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sexual incentive stimuli activate sexual motivation and heighten general arousal, leading individuals to approach and engage in sexual acts. These interactions further enhance arousal, culminating in orgasm. Research suggests that the basic mechanisms of sexual motivation and arousal are similar in rodents and humans.
Sexual incentive stimuli activate sexual motivation and heighten the level of general arousal. The sexual motive may induce the individual to approach the incentive, and eventually to initiate sexual acts. Both approach and the ensuing copulatory interaction further enhance general arousal. We present data from rodents and humans in support of these assertions. We then suggest that orgasm is experienced when the combined level of excitation surpasses a threshold. In order to analyze the neurobiological bases of sexual motivation, we employ the concept of a central motive state. We then discuss the mechanisms involved in the long- and short-term control of that state as well as those mediating the momentaneous actions of sexual incentive stimuli. This leads to an analysis of the neurobiology behind the interindividual differences in responsivity of the sexual central motive state. Knowledge is still fragmentary, and many contradictory observations have been made. Nevertheless, we conclude that the basic mechanisms of sexual motivation and the role of general arousal are similar in rodents and humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available