4.4 Article

Structural connectivity mapping in human hippocampal-subfields using super-resolution hybrid diffusion imaging: a feasibility study

Journal

NEURORADIOLOGY
Volume 64, Issue 10, Pages 1989-2000

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-022-02968-z

Keywords

Normal aging; Structural connectivity; Diffusion imaging; Hippocampal subfields; Super-resolution

Funding

  1. NIH NIA [R01 AG053993]
  2. IADRC [P30 AG010133, R01 AG019771, R01 CA129769]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to introduce a new methodology for studying hippocampus-aging using sub-millimeter super-resolution hybrid diffusion imaging (HYDI) MRI. The findings showed reduced structural connectivity in the hippocampal subfields of older adults compared to younger adults, providing new insights into the relationship between hippocampal connectivity and different types of dementia.
Purpose The goal of the current study was to introduce a new methodology that holds a promise to be used in hippocampus-aging studies using sub-millimeter super-resolution hybrid diffusion imaging (HYDI) MRI. Methods HYDI diffusion data were acquired in two groups of older and younger healthy participants recruited from the Indiana Alzheimer's Disease Research Center and community. These data were then transformed into super-resolution diffusion images before the hippocampal subfield analyses. We studied the correlation between the subjects' age and the structural connectivity involving the hippocampal subfields and the connectivity between the whole hippocampus and the cerebral cortex. Results Structural integrity derived from the tractography streamlines between the hippocampal subfields was reduced in older than younger adults. Conclusion The findings offered a new promising framework, and they opened avenues for future studies to explore the relationship between the structural connectivity in the hippocampal area and different types of dementia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available