4.7 Article

Predicting Amyloid Positivity in Cognitively Unimpaired Older Adults A Machine Learning Approach Using A4 Data

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 98, Issue 24, Pages E2425-E2435

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000200553

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [NIA K23 AG063993, NIA AG03949]
  2. Alzheimer's Association [2019-AACSF-641329]
  3. Cure Alzheimer's Fund
  4. Leonard and Sylvia Marx Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed and tested a risk score system called Positive A beta Risk Score (PARS) for predicting beta-amyloid (A beta) positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals. The PARS models showed moderate accuracy in predicting A beta positivity, and may be used to identify individuals at risk for early intervention and treatment.
Background and Objectives To develop and test the performance of the Positive A beta Risk Score (PARS) for prediction of beta-amyloid (A beta) positivity in cognitively unimpaired individuals for use in clinical research. Detecting A beta positivity is essential for identifying at-risk individuals who are candidates for early intervention with amyloid targeted treatments. Methods We used data from 4,134 cognitively normal individuals from the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer's (A4) Study. The sample was divided into training and test sets. A modified version of AutoScore, a machine learning-based software tool, was used to develop a scoring system using the training set. Three risk scores were developed using candidate predictors in various combinations from the following categories: demographics (age, sex, education, race, family history, body mass index, marital status, and ethnicity), subjective measures (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study Activities of Daily Living-Prevention Instrument, Geriatric Depression Scale, and Memory Complaint Questionnaire), objective measures (free recall, Mini-Mental State Examination, immediate recall, digit symbol substitution, and delayed logical memory scores), and APOE4 status. Performance of the risk scores was evaluated in the independent test set. Results PARS model 1 included age, body mass index (BMI), and family history and had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.60 (95% CI 0.57-0.64). PARS model 2 included free recall in addition to the PARS model 1 variables and had an AUC of 0.61 (0.58-0.64). PARS model 3, which consisted of age, BMI, and APOE4 information, had an AUC of 0.73 (0.70-0.76). PARS model 3 showed the highest, but still moderate, performance metrics in comparison with other models with sensitivity of 72.0% (67.6%-76.4%), specificity of 62.1% (58.8%-65.4%), accuracy of 65.3% (62.7%-68.0%), and positive predictive value of 48.1% (44.1%-52.1%). Discussion PARS models are a set of simple and practical risk scores that may improve our ability to identify individuals more likely to be amyloid positive. The models can potentially be used to enrich trials and serve as a screening step in research settings. This approach can be followed by the use of additional variables for the development of improved risk scores. Classification of Evidence This study provides Class II evidence that in cognitively unimpaired individuals PARS models predict A beta positivity with moderate accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available