4.6 Article

Neuroprognostication: a conceptual framework

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 7, Pages 419-427

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41582-022-00644-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [R25NS06574309, R21NS109627]
  2. NIH Director's Office [DP2HD101400]
  3. James S. McDonnell Foundation
  4. Tiny Blue Dot Foundation
  5. National Institute on Disability, Independent Living and Rehabilitation Research [90DPTB0011]
  6. NIDILRR [1004328, 90DPTB0011] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a stepwise conceptual framework for neuroprognostication after severe brain injury, aiming to provide structure and guidance to supplement clinical judgement and direct future investigation.
In this Perspectives article, David Fischer and colleagues present a stepwise conceptual framework for neuroprognostication after severe brain injury, with the aim of providing structure and guidance to supplement clinical judgement and direct future investigation. Neuroprognostication, or the prediction of recovery from disorders of consciousness caused by severe brain injury, is as critical as it is complex. With profound implications for mortality and quality of life, neuroprognostication draws upon an intricate set of biomedical, probabilistic, psychosocial and ethical factors. However, the clinical approach to neuroprognostication is often unsystematic, and consequently, variable among clinicians and prone to error. Here, we offer a stepwise conceptual framework for reasoning through neuroprognostic determinations - including an evaluation of neurological function, estimation of a recovery trajectory, definition of goals of care and consideration of patient values - culminating in a clinically actionable formula for weighing the risks and benefits of life-sustaining treatment. Although the complexity of neuroprognostication might never be fully reducible to arithmetic, this systematic approach provides structure and guidance to supplement clinical judgement and direct future investigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available