4.7 Article

Single-cell genomic profiling of human dopamine neurons identifies a population that selectively degenerates in Parkinson's disease

Journal

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages 588-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01061-1

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F30AG069446-01, DP2AG058488, U01MH124602]
  2. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative [2017-175259]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, single-cell genomics was used to analyze thousands of human dopamine neurons and identify a unique population susceptible to Parkinson's disease, which was enriched for genetic risk.
The loss of dopamine (DA) neurons within the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) is a defining pathological hallmark of Parkinson's disease (PD). Nevertheless, the molecular features associated with DA neuron vulnerability have not yet been fully identified. Here, we developed a protocol to enrich and transcriptionally profile DA neurons from patients with PD and matched controls, sampling a total of 387,483 nuclei, including 22,048 DA neuron profiles. We identified ten populations and spatially localized each within the SNpc using Slide-seq. A single subtype, marked by the expression of the gene AGTR1 and spatially confined to the ventral tier of SNpc, was highly susceptible to loss in PD and showed the strongest upregulation of targets of TP53 and NR2F2, nominating molecular processes associated with degeneration. This same vulnerable population was specifically enriched for the heritable risk associated with PD, highlighting the importance of cell-intrinsic processes in determining the differential vulnerability of DA neurons to PD-associated degeneration. The authors used single-cell genomics to profile thousands of human dopamine neurons and identify one uniquely Parkinson's disease-susceptible population, which was enriched for genetic risk for Parkinson's disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available