4.8 Article

Ab initio phasing macromolecular structures using electron-counted MicroED data

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages 724-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01485-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P41GM136508]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports on the sub- and near-atomic structures of triclinic lysozyme and serine protease proteinase K, respectively, and demonstrates the successful application of ab initio phasing using electron counted MicroED data to solve macromolecular structures.
This article reports sub- and near-atomic structures of triclinic lysozyme and serine protease proteinase K, respectively, providing first demonstrations of ab initio phasing using electron counted MicroED data to solve macromolecular structures. Structures of two globular proteins were determined ab initio using microcrystal electron diffraction (MicroED) data that were collected on a direct electron detector in counting mode. Microcrystals were identified using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and thinned with a focused ion beam (FIB) to produce crystalline lamellae of ideal thickness. Continuous-rotation data were collected using an ultra-low exposure rate to enable electron counting in diffraction. For the first sample, triclinic lysozyme extending to a resolution of 0.87 angstrom, an ideal helical fragment of only three alanine residues provided initial phases. These phases were improved using density modification, allowing the entire atomic structure to be built automatically. A similar approach was successful on a second macromolecular sample, proteinase K, which is much larger and diffracted to a resolution of 1.5 angstrom. These results demonstrate that macromolecules can be determined to sub-angstrom resolution by MicroED and that ab initio phasing can be successfully applied to counting data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available