4.8 Article

Precision size and refractive index analysis of weakly scattering nanoparticles in polydispersions

Journal

NATURE METHODS
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 586-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41592-022-01460-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Eckardt
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

iNTA is a new method that combines interferometric detection of scattering with nanoparticle tracking analysis, providing high sensitivity and precision in determining the size and refractive index distributions of suspended nanoparticles. It has shown remarkable ability in resolving the constituents of multicomponent and polydisperse samples, and has already made advancements in several important applications.
iNTA combines interferometric detection of scattering with nanoparticle tracking analysis for determining the size and refractive index distributions of nanoparticles in suspension with high sensitivity and precision. Characterization of the size and material properties of particles in liquid suspensions is in very high demand, for example, in the analysis of colloidal samples or of bodily fluids such as urine or blood plasma. However, existing methods are limited in their ability to decipher the constituents of realistic samples. Here we introduce iNTA as a new method that combines interferometric detection of scattering with nanoparticle tracking analysis to reach unprecedented sensitivity and precision in determining the size and refractive index distributions of nanoparticles in suspensions. After benchmarking iNTA with samples of colloidal gold, we present its remarkable ability to resolve the constituents of various multicomponent and polydisperse samples of known origin. Furthermore, we showcase the method by elucidating the refractive index and size distributions of extracellular vesicles from Leishmania parasites and human urine. The current performance of iNTA already enables advances in several important applications, but we also discuss possible improvements.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available