4.8 Article

Direct observation of the dead-cone effect in quantum chromodynamics

Journal

NATURE
Volume 605, Issue 7910, Pages 440-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04572-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) collaboration
  2. ALICE detector: A. I. Alikhanyan National Science Laboratory (Yerevan Physics Institute) Foundation (ANSL)
  3. State Committee of Science and World Federation of Scientists (WFS), Armenia
  4. Austrian Academy of Sciences, Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [M 2467-N36]
  5. Nationalstiftung fur Forschung, Technologie und Entwicklung, Austria
  6. Ministry of Communications and High Technologies
  7. National Nuclear Research Center, Azerbaijan
  8. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico (CNPq)
  9. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (Finep)
  10. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP)
  11. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Brazil
  12. Ministry of Education of China (MOEC)
  13. Ministry of Science AMP
  14. Technology of China (MSTC)
  15. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), China
  16. Ministry of Science and Education and Croatian Science Foundation, Croatia
  17. Centro de Aplicaciones Tecnologicas y Desarrollo Nuclear (CEADEN), Cubaenergia, Cuba
  18. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic, Czech Republic
  19. Danish Council for Independent Research \ Natural Sciences, the VILLUM FONDEN
  20. Danish National Research Foundation (DNRF), Denmark
  21. Helsinki Institute of Physics (HIP), Finland
  22. Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique (CEA)
  23. Institut National de Physique Nucleaire et de Physique des Particules (IN2P3)
  24. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), France
  25. Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung (BMBF)
  26. GSI Helmholtzzentrum fur Schwerionenforschung GmbH, Germany
  27. General Secretariat for Research and Technology
  28. Ministry of Education, Research and Religions, Greece
  29. National Research, Development and Innovation Office, Hungary
  30. Department of Atomic Energy Government of India (DAE)
  31. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST)
  32. University Grants Commission
  33. Government of India (UGC)
  34. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India
  35. Indonesian Institute of Science, Indonesia
  36. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), Italy
  37. Institute for Innovative Science and Technology
  38. Nagasaki Institute of Applied Science (IIST)
  39. Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT)
  40. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI, Japan
  41. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia (CONACYT) y Tecnologia, through Fondo de Cooperacion Internacional en Ciencia y Tecnologia (FONCICYT)
  42. Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA), Mexico
  43. Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (NWO), the Netherlands
  44. Research Council of Norway, Norway
  45. Commission on Science and Technology for Sustainable Development in the South (COMSATS), Pakistan
  46. Pontificia Universidad Catolica del Peru, Peru
  47. Ministry of Education and Science
  48. National Science Centre and WUT ID-UB, Poland
  49. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Republic of Korea
  50. Ministry of Education and Scientific Research
  51. Institute of Atomic Physics and Ministry of Research and Innovation and Institute of Atomic Physics, Romania
  52. Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR)
  53. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation
  54. National Research Centre Kurchatov Institute
  55. Russian Science Foundation and Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Russia
  56. Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic, Slovakia
  57. National Research Foundation of South Africa, South Africa
  58. Swedish Research Council (VR)
  59. Knut AMP
  60. Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW), Sweden
  61. European Organization for Nuclear Research, Switzerland
  62. Suranaree University of Technology (SUT)
  63. National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSDTA)
  64. Office of the Higher Education Commission under NRU project of Thailand, Thailand
  65. Turkish Energy, Nuclear and Mineral Research Agency (TENMAK), Turkey
  66. National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Ukraine
  67. Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), United Kingdom
  68. National Science Foundation of the United States of America (NSF)
  69. United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Physics (DOE NP), United States of America

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In particle collider experiments, the direct observation of the QCD dead cone effect in the parton shower of charm quarks has been achieved using new iterative declustering techniques. This observation confirms a fundamental feature of QCD and provides a direct experimental observation of the non-zero mass of the charm quark.
In particle collider experiments, elementary particle interactions with large momentum transfer produce quarks and gluons (known as partons) whose evolution is governed by the strong force, as described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD)(1). These partons subsequently emit further partons in a process that can be described as a parton shower(2), which culminates in the formation of detectable hadrons. Studying the pattern of the parton shower is one of the key experimental tools for testing QCD. This pattern is expected to depend on the mass of the initiating parton, through a phenomenon known as the dead-cone effect, which predicts a suppression of the gluon spectrum emitted by a heavy quark of mass m(Q) and energy E, within a cone of angular size m(Q)/E around the emitter(3). Previously, a direct observation of the dead-cone effect in QCD had not been possible, owing to the challenge of reconstructing the cascading quarks and gluons from the experimentally accessible hadrons. We report the direct observation of the QCD dead cone by using new iterative declustering techniques(4,5) to reconstruct the parton shower of charm quarks. This result confirms a fundamental feature of QCD. Furthermore, the measurement of a dead-cone angle constitutes a direct experimental observation of the non-zero mass of the charm quark, which is a fundamental constant in the standard model of particle physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available