4.8 Article

Amyloid fibrils in FTLD-TDP are composed of TMEM106B and not TDP-43

Journal

NATURE
Volume 605, Issue 7909, Pages 304-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-04670-9

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [1S10RR23057, IS10OD018111, AG 054022, AG061847, GM007185, GM103479]
  2. NSF [DBI-1338135, DGE-1650604]
  3. California NanoSystems Institute at UCLA
  4. DOE [DE-FC02-02ER63421]
  5. ADRC [P30 AG062677]
  6. Einstein Aging Study [P01 AG003949]
  7. ALLFTD [U19 AG063911]
  8. National Facility for Translational Medicine (Shanghai)
  9. [C9ORF72 P01 (P01 NS084974)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that amyloid fibrils in FTLD-TDP patients are formed by TMEM106B protein rather than TDP-43 protein. In addition, abundant non-fibrillar aggregated TDP-43 protein was observed.
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the third most common neurodegenerative condition after Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases(1). FTLD typically presents in 45 to 64 year olds with behavioural changes or progressive decline of language skills(2). The subtype FTLD-TDP is characterized by certain clinical symptoms and pathological neuronal inclusions with TAR DNA-binding protein (TDP-43) immunoreactivity(3). Here we extracted amyloid fibrils from brains of four patients representing four of the five FTLD-TDP subclasses, and determined their structures by cryo-electron microscopy. Unexpectedly, all amyloid fibrils examined were composed of a 135-residue carboxy-terminal fragment of transmembrane protein 106B (TMEM106B), a lysosomal membrane protein previously implicated as a genetic risk factor for FTLD-TDP4. In addition to TMEM106B fibrils, we detected abundant non-fibrillar aggregated TDP-43 by immunogold labelling. Our observations confirm that FTLD-TDP is associated with amyloid fibrils, and that the fibrils are formed by TMEM106B rather than TDP-43.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available