4.8 Article

In Situ Ion Counting for Improved Implanted Ion Error Rate and Silicon Vacancy Yield Uncertainty

Journal

NANO LETTERS
Volume 22, Issue 8, Pages 3212-3218

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04646

Keywords

focused ion beam; silicon vacancy; in situ ion counting; photoluminescence; autocorrelation

Funding

  1. U.S. DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0003525]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an in situ counted ion implantation experiment that significantly reduces the error on the number of ions required to form a single optically active silicon vacancy (SiV) defect in diamond compared to traditional timed implantation. By analyzing the ion number using in situ detection and postimplantation analysis, the error is improved by 7-fold compared to timed implantation. Additionally, the study confirms the presence of single-photon emitters in 82% of the analyzed positions through Hanbury-Brown-Twiss interferometry.
An in situ counted ion implantation experiment improving the error on the number of ions required to form a single optically active silicon vacancy (SiV) defect in diamond 7-fold compared to timed implantation is presented. Traditional timed implantation relies on a beam current measurement followed by implantation with a preset pulse duration. It is dominated by Poisson statistics, resulting in large errors for low ion numbers. Instead, our in situ detection, measuring the ion number arriving at the substrate, results in a 2-fold improvement of the error on the ion number required to generate a single SiV compared to timed implantation. Through postimplantation analysis, the error is improved 7-fold compared to timed implantation. SiVs are detected by photoluminescence spectroscopy, and the yield of 2.98% is calculated through the photoluminescence count rate. Hanbury-Brown-Twiss interferometry is performed on locations potentially hosting single-photon emitters, confirming that 82% of the locations exhibit single photon emission statistics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available