4.6 Article

Towards a better understanding of annotation tools for medical imaging: a survey

Journal

MULTIMEDIA TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS
Volume 81, Issue 18, Pages 25877-25911

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-022-12100-1

Keywords

Annotations; Medical images; Segmentation; Taggining

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Medical imaging refers to various technologies used to diagnose, monitor, or treat medical conditions. Deep learning and machine learning techniques provide solutions for image interpretation in the medical field. Large amounts of high-quality training data and annotation tools are essential for training algorithms to achieve human-level performance.
Medical imaging refers to several different technologies that are used to view the human body to diagnose, monitor, or treat medical conditions. It requires significant expertise to efficiently and correctly interpret the images generated by each of these technologies, which among others include radiography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging. Deep learning and machine learning techniques provide different solutions for medical image interpretation including those associated with detection and diagnosis. Despite the huge success of deep learning algorithms in image analysis, training algorithms to reach human-level performance in these tasks depends on the availability of large amounts of high-quality training data, including high-quality annotations to serve as ground-truth. Different annotation tools have been developed to assist with the annotation process. In this survey, we present the currently available annotation tools for medical imaging, including descriptions of graphical user interfaces (GUI) and supporting instruments. The main contribution of this study is to provide an intensive review of the popular annotation tools and show their successful usage in annotating medical imaging dataset to guide researchers in this area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available