4.7 Article

Reflection symmetry in the folded light curve of the Crab pulsar from NICER

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 514, Issue 1, Pages 185-190

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1325

Keywords

stars: neutron; pulsars: general; pulsars: individual: PSR J0534+2200; pulsars: individual: PSR B0531+21; X-rays: general

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that the edges of the first and second peaks of Crab pulsar's high-resolution folded light curve at soft X-ray energies are only statistically similar in a narrow phase range.
The rotation powered pulsars Crab, Vela, and Geminga have double peaked folded light curves (FLC) at gamma-ray energies that have an approximate reflection symmetry. Here, this aspect is studied at soft X-ray energy by analysing a high-resolution FLC of the Crab pulsar obtained at 1-10 keV, using the Neutron star Interior Composition Explorer observatory. The rising edge of the first peak of the FLC and the reflected version of the falling edge of the second peak are compared in several ways, and phase ranges are identified where the two curves are statistically similar. The best matching occurs when the two peaks are aligned, but only in a small phase range of approximate to 0.0244 just below their peaks; their mean difference is -0.78 +/- 1.8 photons s(-1) with a reduced chi(2) of 0.93. If the first curve is convolved by a Laplace function, the corresponding numbers are phase range of approximate to 0.0274, mean difference of -1.23 +/- 1.30 and chi(2) of 0.76. These phase ranges are much smaller than those over which the reflection symmetry has been perceived. Therefore, the only way the two edges can have a mirror relation over a substantial phase range is if one invokes a broad and faint emission component of amplitude approximate to 100 photons s(-1) and width approximate to 0.1 in phase, centred at phase approximate to 0.1 beyond the second peak.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available