4.7 Article

Stellar core-merger-induced collapse: new formation pathways for black holes, Thorne-Zytkow objects, magnetars, and superluminous supernovae

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 513, Issue 4, Pages 4802-4813

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac631

Keywords

binaries: close; stars: black holes; stars: evolution; stars: neutron; supernovae: general; white dwarfs

Funding

  1. NSF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a new formation channel for BHs and peculiar NSs, called the core-merger-induced collapse (CMIC) model. By merging an oxygen/neon/magnesium composition white dwarf with the core of a hydrogen-rich or helium-rich non-degenerate star during the common-envelope phase, unique new types of objects are created. Simulation results show that the CMIC channel could significantly contribute to the populations of pulsars, TZOs, magnetars, and BHs.
Most neutron stars (NSs) and black holes (BHs) are believed to be the final remnants in the evolution of massive stars. In this study, we propose a new formation channel for the formation of BHs and peculiar NSs [specifically, magnetars and Thorne-Zytkow objects (TZOs)], which we refer to as the core-merger-induced collapse (CMIC) model. This model involves the merger during a common-envelope phase of an oxygen/neon/magnesium composition white dwarf and the core of a hydrogen-rich or heliumrich non-degenerate star, leading to the creation of peculiar new types of objects. The results of binary population synthesis simulations show that the CMIC channel could make important contributions to the populations of (millisecond) pulsars, TZOs, magnetars, and BHs. The possibility of superluminous supernovae powered by TZOs, magnetars, and BHs formed through the CMIC model is also being investigated. Magnetars with immediate matter surroundings formed after the CMIC might be good sources for fast radio bursts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available