4.7 Article

Atomic data and opacity calculations in La v-x ions for the investigation of kilonova emission spectra

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 513, Issue 2, Pages 2302-2325

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac1063

Keywords

atomic data; opacity; neutron star mergers

Funding

  1. FRIA fellowship
  2. FWO
  3. F.R.S. - FNRS under the Excellence of Science (EOS) programme [O.0004.22]
  4. F.R.S. - FNRS [2.5020.11]
  5. Walloon Region of Belgium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new set of radiative parameters for spectral lines in La v-x ions is reported, which were determined through cross-comparisons and validations using three independent theoretical methods. This complete and reliable set of parameters is useful for analyzing spectra emitted in the early phases of kilonovae following neutron star mergers.
A new set of radiative parameters for spectral lines in La v-x ions is reported in this paper. These data were determined through the use of a multiplatform approach involving three independent theoretical methods, i.e. the relativistic Hartree-Fock method including core-polarization corrections (HFR + CPOL), the multiconfiguration Dirac-Hartree-Fock (MCDHF) method, and the particle-hole configuration-interaction (PH-CI) method implemented in the AMBIT program. Based on cross-comparisons between the results obtained with these three methods, and from comparisons with the few previously published experimental and theoretical data, the most complete and reliable set of wavelengths, transition probabilities, and oscillator strengths was then used to determine the necessary opacities for the analysis of the spectra emitted in the early phases of kilonovae following neutron star mergers, i.e. for typical conditions corresponding to temperatures T > 20 000 K, a density rho = 10(-)(10) g cm(-3) and a time after the merger t = 0.1 d.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available