4.6 Review

Clay, Zeolite and Oxide Minerals: Natural Catalytic Materials for the Ozonation of Organic Pollutants

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27072151

Keywords

catalytic ozonation; natural materials; water treatment

Funding

  1. MCIN/AEI [RTI2018-096467-B-I00]
  2. ERDF A way of making Europe [RTI2018-096467-B-I00]
  3. CONICET
  4. UNMdP
  5. ANPCyT (Argentina) [PICT 2019-0935, PICT 2017-2322]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the use of natural materials as catalysts in the ozonation process. It emphasizes the structural characteristics and modifications of these materials, as well as the catalytic oxidation mechanism, operating parameters, and degradation efficiency. The review suggests that further research is needed in realistic scenarios to transfer this technology to real wastewater treatment.
Ozone has been successfully employed in water treatment due to its ability to oxidize a wide variety of refractory compounds. In order to increase the process efficiency and optimize its economy, the implementation of heterogeneous catalysts has been encouraged. In this context, the use of cheap and widely available natural materials is a promising option that would promote the utilization of ozone in a cost-effective water treatment process. This review describes the use of natural clays, zeolites and oxides as supports or active catalysts in the ozonation process, with emphasis on the structural characteristics and modifications performed in the raw natural materials; the catalytic oxidation mechanism; effect of the operating parameters and degradation efficiency outcomes. According to the information compiled, more research in realistic scenarios is needed (i.e., real wastewater matrix or continuous operation in pilot scale) in order to transfer this technology to the treatment of real wastewater streams.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available