4.6 Review

Immuno-Imaging (PET/SPECT)-Quo Vadis?

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules27103354

Keywords

immuno-imaging; molecular imaging; immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitors; drug design; immunoPET; PET; CT; SPECT; CT; response criteria; tumor microenvironment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of certain cancer types, but conventional methods for assessing treatment response pose challenges. This study analyzed published tracers and found that most target PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, and CD8 receptors using antibodies or their fragments. It also identified a lack of innovation in tracer development.
The use of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment regimen of certain cancer types, but response assessment has become a difficult task with conventional methods such as CT/MRT or FDG PET-CT and the classical response criteria such as RECIST or PERCIST which have been developed for chemotherapeutic treatment. Plenty of new tracers have been published to improve the assessment of treatment response and to stratify the patient population. We gathered the information on published tracers (in total, 106 individual SPECT/PET tracers were identified) and performed a descriptor-based analysis; in this way, we classify the tracers with regard to target choice, developability (probability to progress from preclinical stage into the clinic), translatability (probability to be widely applied in the 'real world'), and (assumed) diagnostic quality. In our analysis, we show that most tracers are targeting PD-L1, PD-1, CTLA-4, and CD8 receptors by using antibodies or their fragments. Another finding is that plenty of tracers possess only minor iterations regarding chelators and nuclides instead of approaching the problem in a new innovative way. Based on the data, we suggest an orthogonal approach by targeting intracellular targets with PET-activatable small molecules that are currently underrepresented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available