4.5 Article

Synthesis, carbonic anhydrase inhibition, anticancer activity, and molecular docking studies of 1,3,4-oxadiazole derivatives

Journal

MOLECULAR DIVERSITY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 193-208

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-022-10416-6

Keywords

1; 3; 4-Oxadiazole analogues; Carbonic inhibition; Kinetic mechanism; Molecular modelling

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, various organic compounds with 1,3,4-oxadiazole as a core structure were synthesized and their structures were determined using different analytical methods. Compound 7g was found to have the most potent carbonic anhydrase inhibitory activity and showed anticancer activity against B16F10 melanoma cells.
In this work, we have synthesized various organic compounds possessing 1,3,4-oxadiazole as a core structure and the structure of the newly synthesized target compounds has been revealed using different analytical approaches such as FT-IR, LCMS, and NMR (proton and carbon), respectively. The in vitro carbonic anhydrase potentials of these synthesized 17 different analogues were investigated. The result suggests that compound 7g, a 3-pyridine substituted analogue with an IC50 of 0.1 mu M, was found to have the most potent carbonic inhibitory activity (11-fold more active) than the positive control (acetazolamide) with an IC50 of 1.1 +/- 0.1 mu M. Besides, among the series 7(a-q) approved in the identification of four potent carbonic anhydrase inhibitors with the IC50 standards varies from 0.1 to 1.0 +/- 0.1 mu M. Additionally, the non-competitive behaviour for potent compound 7g was analysed using the Lineweaver-Burk plot from the kinetic study. Furthermore, the anticancer activity of all the synthesized compounds screened against B16F10 melanoma cells using the MTT assay method. Additionally, the molecular docking studies revealed that 7g inhibitor shows good binding energy as well as good binding interaction pattern along with enzyme.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available