4.7 Review

A review of environmental aspect of rare earth element extraction processes and solution purification techniques

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 179, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107430

Keywords

Rare earth elements; Thorium; Uranium; Environmental impact; Separation; Radioactivity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rare earth elements (REEs) are crucial for technology and defense industries, but the environmental impact of rare earth mining has not been thoroughly studied. This review summarizes the environmental consequences of rare earth extraction processes and discusses separation techniques for radioactive materials from rare earths.
Rare earth elements (REEs) are vital for the technology, military, and defense industries. They have been recognized as critical due to potential scarcity, supply constraints, and lack of minable concentrations. Therefore, alternative sources are needed to meet the demand and continue manufacturing rare earth-dependent products. However, the environmental prospect of rare earth mining was not investigated enough, and comprehensive studies are lacking. It demands serious consideration as toxic radionuclides are seen in the same mineralization as rare earths regardless of their primary or secondary sources. The concentration of these hazardous trace elements may be elevated as a result of extraction and beneficiation processes. Unless proper separation and disposal are performed, these radionuclides accumulate on the surface of the soil or integrate with aquatic systems, which consequently raise environmental and health concerns. This review manuscript compiled the environmental impact and aspect of rare earth extraction processes while addressing separation techniques for these radioactive materials from rare earths, emphasizing selective precipitation, solvent extraction, and solid-phase separation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available