4.7 Article

Comparison between etheramine and amidoamine (N-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]dodecanamide) collectors: Adsorption mechanisms on quartz and hematite unveiled by molecular simulations

Journal

MINERALS ENGINEERING
Volume 180, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.mineng.2022.107470

Keywords

Iron ore; Flotation; Amidoamine; Molecular dynamics; Adsorption mechanism; Hydrogen bonding; Etheramine; Adsorption layer arrangement

Funding

  1. LABMOL/CETEM (Centre for Mineral Technology)
  2. GeoRessources Laboratory, University of Lorraine
  3. Clariant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reveals the differences in adsorption between etheramine and amidoamine N-[3(dimethylamino)propyl]dodecanamide in industrial iron ore flotation at a molecular level. Molecular dynamics simulations show that amidoamine has a more selective adsorption on the quartz surface compared to etheramine. The selective adsorption is attributed to the combination of water coordination at the hematite-(D2) surface and the bulky head group of amidoamine. Neutral molecules of etheramine and amidoamine are shielded by water coordination at the hematite-(D2) surface, making adsorption difficult. Protonated collector molecules of amidoamine experience steric hindrance due to the combination of the bulky head group and water on the hematite-(D2) surface, impairing adsorption. However, etherammonium cations can still adsorb on the hematite surface. Additionally, hydrogen bonding between collectors is favored by the amide group, contributing to the stability of the adsorption layer.
This work describes, at a molecular level, the adsorption differences between etheramine and amidoamine N-[3(dimethylamino)propyl]dodecanamide, a conventional silicate collector and one not yet used in industrial iron ore flotation, respectively. The molecular dynamics simulations showed that the adsorption of this amidoamine on the quartz surface, regarding the quartz-hematite system, tends to be more selective than etheramine. The explanation for this behavior is related to the combination of the water coordination at hematite-(D2) surface and the bulky head group of the amidoamine. Regarding the neutral molecules of etheramine and amidoamine, the coordination of water on the surface of hematite-(D2) acts as a shield, making it difficult for collector adsorption. In relation to protonated collector molecules, the combination of the amidoamine head group (with methyl bonded to nitrogen in the tertiary amine) with the water on the hematite-(D2) surface causes steric hindrance, impairing the amidoamine adsorption, while the etherammonium cations manage to adsorb on this hematite surface anyway. Also, the amide group favors hydrogen-bonding between collectors in the adsorption layer, which brings stability to the layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available