4.4 Article

HPV DNA testing with cytology triage in cervical cancer screening: Influence of revealing HPV infection status

Journal

CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY
Volume 123, Issue 12, Pages 745-754

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21596

Keywords

cervical cancer; human papillomavirus (HPV); Papanicolaou test; screening

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) [MCT-54063]
  2. Program for Appropriate Technology in Health
  3. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo
  4. CIHR [83320]
  5. Reseau FRQS SIDA-MI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUNDKnowledge of cervical human papillomavirus (HPV) status might influence a cytotechnician's assessment of cellular abnormalities. The authors compared original cytotechnicians' Papanicolaou (Pap) readings for which HPV status was concealed with Pap rereads for which HPV status was revealed separately for 3 screening populations. METHODSPreviously collected cervical Pap smears and clinical data were obtained from the Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial (study A), the Democratic Republic of Congo Community-Based Screening Study (study B), and the Brazilian Investigation into Nutrition and Cervical Cancer Prevention (study C). Smears were reread with knowledge of HPV status for all HPV-positive women as well as a sample of HPV-negative women. Diagnostic performance of Pap cytology was compared between original readings and rereads. RESULTSA total of 1767 Pap tests were reread. Among 915 rereads for HPV-positive women, the contrast between revealed and concealed Pap readings demonstrated revisions from negative to positive results for 109 women (cutoff was atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse) and 124 women (cutoff was low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions [LSIL] or worse). For a disease threshold of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia of grade 2 or worse, specificity significantly declined at the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cutoff for studies A (86.6% to 75.3%) and C (42.5% to 15.5%), and at the LSIL cutoff for study C (61.9% to 37.6%). Sensitivity remained nearly unchanged between readings, except in study C, in which reread performance was superior (91.3% vs 71.9% for the LSIL cutoff). CONCLUSIONSA reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of Pap cytology was observed when revealing patients' cervical HPV status, possibly due to a heightened awareness of potential abnormalities, which led to more false-positive results. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol) 2015;123:745-754. (c) 2015 American Cancer Society. In the current study, knowledge of human papillomavirus positivity by cytotechnicians results in a reduction in the diagnostic accuracy of Papanicolaou cytology, contrary to expectations. Findings from this study underscore the importance of maintaining meticulous quality control practices for cytology, even when serving as a triage test subsequent to primary human papillomavirus testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available