Journal
MEDICINE & SCIENCE IN SPORTS & EXERCISE
Volume 54, Issue 8, Pages 1335-1345Publisher
LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002926
Keywords
RESTING ENERGY EXPENDITURE; REE; ENERGY AVAILABILITY; SPORT; INDIRECT CALORIMETRY; PREDICTIVE EQUATIONS
Categories
Funding
- Brazil Olympic Committee
- Brazilian Funding Authority for Studies and Projects
- Spanish Ministry of Education [FPU15/04059]
- University of Granada, Plan Propio de Investigacion 2020 Programa de Contratos Puente
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The present study aims to assess the agreement between measured resting metabolic rate and different predictive equations, and propose new equations for estimating the rate in high-level athletes. The new equations showed good agreement and accuracy, with Cunningham's equation being the best option among the existing equations.
Purpose The present study aims a) to assess the agreement between the measured resting metabolic rate (RMR) using indirect calorimetry and different predictive equations (predicted RMR), and b) to propose and cross-validate two new predictive equations for estimating the RMR in high-level athletes. Methods The RMR of 102 athletes (44 women) was assessed using indirect calorimetry, whereas the body composition was assessed using skinfolds. Comparisons between measured and predicted RMR values were performed using one-way ANOVA. Mean difference, root mean square error (RMSE), simple linear regression, and Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate the agreement between measured and predicted RMR. The accuracy of predictive equations was analyzed using narrower and wider accuracy limits (+/- 5% and +/- 10%, respectively) of measured RMR. Multiple linear regression models were employed to develop the new predictive equations based on traditional predictors (equation 1) and the stepwise method (equation 2). Results The new equations 1 and 2 presented good agreement based on the mean difference (3 and -15 kcal center dot d(-1)), RMSE (200 and 192 kcal center dot d(-1)), and R-2 (0.71 and 0.74), respectively, and accuracy (61% of subjects between the limit of +/- 10% of measured RMR). Cunningham's equation provided the best performance for males and females among the existing equations, whereas Jagim's equation showed the worst performance for males (mean difference = -335 kcal center dot d(-1); RMSE = 386 kcal center dot d(-1)). Compared with measured RMR, most predictive equations showed heteroscedastic distribution (linear regression's intercept and slope significantly different from zero; P <= 0.05), mainly in males. Conclusions The new proposed equations can estimate the RMR in high-level athletes accurately. Cunningham's equation is a good option from existing equations, and Jagim's equation should not be used in high-level male athletes.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available