4.5 Article

Age-specific reference values for the 5th generation cardiac troponin T assay in Chinese children

Journal

MEDICINE
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029101

Keywords

age-specific reference limits; cardiac troponin T; pediatric cardiology; the 99th percentile URL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the normative values of cTnT in Chinese children and reported the age-specific 99th percentile cut-off values. The results have significant clinical implications in the interpretation and use of test results for pediatric cardiology.
The clinical use of the cardiac troponin T (cTnT) assay was limited to the adult population in the diagnosis and prognosis of myocardial injury. However, emerging studies indicated its significant value in the assessment of pediatric cardiology, and it has been routinely measured in most hospitals. Our study investigated the normative values of cTnT in Chinese children and reported the age-specific 99th percentile cut-off for them. A total of 1280 apparently healthy Chinese children were enrolled in our study. Serum levels of cTnT were analyzed on the Roche Elecsys Troponin T Gen 5 STAT assay. According to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute C28-A3 guideline, the 99th percentile upper reference limits (URLs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated in different age subgroups. The 99th percentile URL was 38 (90%CI: 37.0-51.0) ng/L for 1 to <4months old, 26 (90%CI: 25.2-28.5) ng/L for 4 to <= 12months old, and 12 (90%CI: 11.1-12.9) ng/L for 1 to 18 years old, respectively. For subjects aged from 1 to 18years, boys had slightly higher cTnT levels than girls (P = .003), while our assay could not measure low cTnT concentrations (>= the limit of detection) in 50% girls. Our study provided age-specific URLs of cTnT for Chinese children, with the 5th generation cTnT assay from Roche Diagnostics. It had significant clinical implications in the interpretation and use of test results for pediatric cardiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available