4.6 Article

Experimental demonstration of improved magnetorelaxometry imaging performance using optimized coil configurations

Journal

MEDICAL PHYSICS
Volume 49, Issue 5, Pages 3361-3374

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15594

Keywords

condition number; imaging performance; magnetic nanoparticles; magnetorelaxometry imaging; optimization

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund [I 4357-B]
  2. German Research Foundation [WI 4230/4-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetorelaxometry imaging is a promising experimental technique for noninvasive and highly specific reconstruction of magnetic nanoparticle distributions. This study demonstrates the technical feasibility and increased reconstruction accuracy of optimized coil configurations in magnetorelaxometry setups. By optimizing the coil positions and radii using system matrix condition numbers, the optimized coil configurations yield lower condition numbers and improved reconstruction results compared to regular coil grids. These findings provide proof of the practicality and efficacy of optimizing magnetorelaxometry imaging systems in an experimental setting, paving the way for potential clinical applications.
Background Magnetorelaxometry imaging is an experimental imaging technique capable of reconstructing magnetic nanoparticle distributions inside a volume noninvasively and with high specificity. Thus, magnetorelaxometry imaging is a promising candidate for monitoring a number of therapeutical approaches that employ magnetic nanoparticles, such as magnetic drug targeting and magnetic hyperthermia, to guarantee their safety and efficacy. Prior to a potential clinical application of this imaging modality, it is necessary to optimize magnetorelaxometry imaging systems to produce reliable imaging results and to maximize the reconstruction accuracy of the magnetic nanoparticle distributions. Multiple optimization approaches were already applied throughout a number of simulation studies, all of which yielded increased imaging qualities compared to intuitively designed measurement setups. Purpose None of these simulative approaches was conducted in practice such that it still remains unclear if the theoretical results are achievable in an experimental setting. In this study, we demonstrate the technical feasibility and the increased reconstruction accuracy of optimized coil configurations in two distinct magnetorelaxometry setups. Methods The electromagnetic coil positions and radii of a cuboidal as well as a cylindrical magnetorelaxometry imaging setup are optimized by minimizing the system matrix condition numbers of their corresponding linear forward models. The optimized coil configurations are manufactured alongside with two regular coil grids. Magnetorelaxometry measurements of three cuboidal and four cylindrical magnetic nanoparticle phantoms are conducted, and the resulting reconstruction qualities of the optimized and the regular coil configurations are compared. Results The computed condition numbers of the optimized coil configurations are approximately one order of magnitude lower compared to the regular coil grids. The reconstruction results show that for both setups, every phantom is recovered more accurately by the optimized coil configurations compared to the regular coil grids. Additionally, the optimized coil configurations yield better signal qualities. Conclusions The presented experimental study provides a proof of the practicality and the efficacy of optimizing magnetorelaxometry imaging systems with respect to the condition numbers of their system matrices, previously only demonstrated in simulations. From the promising results of our study, we infer that the minimization of the system matrix condition number will also enable the practical optimization of other design parameters of magnetorelaxometry imaging setups (e.g., sensor configuration, coil currents, etc.) in order to improve the achievable reconstruction qualities even further, eventually paving the way towards clinical application of this imaging modality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available