4.6 Letter

Chemical analysis of fresh and aged Australian e-cigarette liquids In reply

Journal

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51481

Keywords

Electronic cigarettes; Analytic chemistry

Funding

  1. Lung Foundation Australia
  2. Cancer Council Western Australia
  3. Scottish Masonic Charitable Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the chemical composition of e-liquids sold in Australia and found that they contain a variety of potentially harmful chemicals for which inhalation toxicity information is not available. Further research is needed to evaluate the potential long-term effects of e-cigarette use on health.
Objectives To assess the chemical composition of electronic cigarette liquids (e-liquids) sold in Australia, in both their fresh and aged forms. Design, setting Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of commercial e-liquids sold in Australia (online and physical stores). Main outcome measures Chemical composition of 65 Australian e-liquids - excipients/solvents, flavouring chemicals, other known e-liquid constituents (including nicotine), and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons - before and after an accelerated ageing process that simulated the effects of vaping. Results The measured levels of propylene glycol and glycerol often diverged from those recorded on the e-liquid label. All e-liquids contained one or more potentially harmful chemicals, including benzaldehyde, menthol, trans-cinnamaldehyde, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Nicotine or nicotyrine were detected in a small proportion of e-liquids at extremely low concentrations. Conclusions Australian e-liquids contain a wide variety of chemicals for which information on inhalation toxicity is not available. Further analyses are required to assess the potential long term effects of e-cigarette use on health.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available