4.7 Review

Utility of optical see-through head mounted displays in augmented reality-assisted surgery: A systematic review

Journal

MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS
Volume 77, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102361

Keywords

Augmented reality; Head-mounted displays; Optical see-through; Human factors

Funding

  1. Wellcome/EPSRC Centre for Interventional and Surgical Sciences (WEISS) [203145Z/16/Z]
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) [EP/P027938/1, EP/R004080/1, EP/P012841/1]
  3. Royal Academy of Engineering [CiET1819/2/36]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article presents a systematic review of the usage of optical see-through head mounted display (OST-HMD) in augmented reality (AR) surgery applications from 2013 to 2020. The study revealed that the Microsoft HoloLens is increasingly dominating the field, with orthopaedic surgery as the most popular application. Surgical guidance is the most common context, and segmented preoperative models are the dominant visualization method. Human factors play a significant role in the utility of OST-HMD.
This article presents a systematic review of optical see-through head mounted display (OST-HMD) usage in augmented reality (AR) surgery applications from 2013 to 2020. Articles were categorised by: OSTHMD device, surgical speciality, surgical application context, visualisation content, experimental design and evaluation, accuracy and human factors of human-computer interaction. 91 articles fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Some clear trends emerge. The Microsoft HoloLens increasingly dominates the field, with orthopaedic surgery being the most popular application (28.6%). By far the most common surgical context is surgical guidance ( n = 58 ) and segmented preoperative models dominate visualisation ( n = 40 ). Experiments mainly involve phantoms ( n = 43 ) or system setup ( n = 21 ), with patient case studies ranking third ( n = 19 ), reflecting the comparative infancy of the field. Experiments cover issues from registration to perception with very different accuracy results. Human factors emerge as significant to OST-HMD utility. Some factors are addressed by the systems proposed, such as attention shift away from the surgical site and mental mapping of 2D images to 3D patient anatomy. Other persistent human factors remain or are caused by OST-HMD solutions, including ease of use, comfort and spatial perception issues. The significant upward trend in published articles is clear, but such devices are not yet established in the operating room and clinical studies showing benefit are lacking. A focused effort addressing technical registration and perceptual factors in the lab coupled with design that incorporates human factors considerations to solve clear clinical problems should ensure that the significant current research effort s will succeed. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available