4.7 Article

Bearing fault diagnosis via generalized logarithm sparse regularization

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108576

Keywords

Sparse representation; Generalized logarithm(G-log) penalty; Convex optimization; Bearing fault diagnosis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075353, 51875376]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new non-convex penalty, the generalized logarithm (G-log) penalty, to enhance sparsity and reduce noise disturbance, thereby improving the accuracy of bearing fault diagnosis.
Bearing fault is the most common causes of rotating machinery failure. Therefore, accurate bearing fault identification technique is of tremendous significance. Vibration monitoring has been used widely and the key is to reconstruct the fault shock components from monitoring signals with noise. Sparse representation is proved to be a promising method to extract the repetitive transient component from noisy signals. However, common sparse representation methods suffer from the shortcomings of insufficient reconstruction accuracy or the underestimation of amplitude. To overcome these drawbacks, we proposed a new non-convex penalty called generalized logarithm(G-log) penalty, which enhances the sparsity and reduces noise disturbance. Although the proposed penalty is not convex itself, the cost function of sparse representation is preserved to be convex by parameter setting, hence the convex optimization algorithms are capable of being applied to obtain the global minimum. In addition, the k-sparsity method is used to decide the regularization parameter adaptively. Simulation and experiments verify that the proposed G-log method performs well in bearing fault diagnosis and generates more reconstruction accuracy compared to other sparse representation methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available