4.7 Article

Blind interpolation for multi-frequency blade tip timing signals

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108946

Keywords

Blade tip timing (BTT); Interpolation; Multi -frequency; Multiple signal classification (MUSIC); Reconstruction; Spectral analysis

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2015CB057404]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China [2019JJ50721]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a blind interpolation method for multi-frequency BTT signals (BIMF) and validates it using two novel algorithms. The simulation results demonstrate the accuracy and advantages of the proposed method, while the experimental results validate its accuracy and stability in spectrum identification.
Blade tip timing (BTT) is a promising non-contact on-line monitoring technique for rotor blades. Although various analytical methods for BTT signals have been developed, their accuracy and stability still need to be improved for subsequent blade damage detection. This paper derives and validates a blind interpolation method for multi-frequency BTT signals (BIMF). It is an integration of two novel algorithms proposed by this paper: (1) the multi-band interpolation (MBI) algorithm breaks the single-band limitation of established interpolation methods, and is capable of accurate and stable spectrum identification and waveform reconstruction when the approximate frequency distribution is known; (2) the real signal-based multiple signal classification (RSMUSIC) algorithm provides reliable prior knowledge of frequency for MBI. Simulation results verify the accuracy of the proposed methods and the advantages of BIMF over the BTT-based compressed sensing algorithms. Experimental results also validate the accuracy and stability of BIMF in spectrum identification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available