4.7 Article

Acoustic source identification using an off-grid and sparsity-based method for sound field reconstruction

Journal

MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 170, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.108869

Keywords

Acoustic source identification; Sound field reconstruction; Microphone array; Off-grid model; Group sparse recovery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52075281, 51975309]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The proposed method achieves high accuracy and efficiency in source identification through an integrated model and group sparsity, capable of handling various noise levels and source frequencies with less computing time.
Acoustic source identification based on the microphone array is an attractive technique, and the effective identification of off-grid sources is still a challenging issue. To improve the accuracy and efficiency of source identification, a novel method based on the off-grid model and group sparsity is proposed. Specifically, both source locations and strengths are considered in an integrated model to reconstruct the sound field with the microphone array at arbitrary positions, and the group minimax concave penalty is employed to promote the group sparsity of identification results. Then, the performance of the proposed method is examined with numerical simulations. Results indicate that the proposed method can identify off-grid sources with higher accuracy than existing methods within a broad range of noise levels and source frequencies, and less computing time is needed than using on-grid approaches. Benefit from the capacity to approximate propagation functions, the computational efficiency can be further enhanced by utilizing coarser search grids. Moreover, experimental results demonstrate the satisfactory performance and application potential of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available