4.7 Review

Effect of different feeding systems on color of longissimus muscle from Bos cattle: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

MEAT SCIENCE
Volume 192, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2022.108871

Keywords

Feeding regime; Beef color; Oxidation; Finishing

Funding

  1. Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) , Brazil for providing the pos doctoral schol- arship [E-26/212.415/2019]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Brazil [E-26/212.415/2019]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of grain-fed and pasture-fed regimes on the color of beef longissimus from Bos cattle through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The results showed that pasture-fed beef had better color, and feeding regimes containing alfalfa, bermudagrass, cowpea, and pearl millet were the most effective for color improvements.
Considering the relevance of meat discoloration for meat production chain and the conflicting results regarding the influence of feeding regimes on color of fresh beef and the lack of meta-analytic studies on this subject we investigated the effect of grain-fed and pasture-fed regimes on color of beef longissimus from Bos cattle through a systematic review with meta-analysis. A systematic search from 2001 to 2021 was performed in two databases and 126 papers were eligible for meta-analysis. Pasture-fed longissimus beef exhibited higher a* (8.21%) and C* (8.61%) values, and lower h* values (17.18%) than grain-fed counterparts, indicating a greater color for longissimus beef from pasture-fed animals. Among the pasture-fed regimes, those containing alfalfa, bermudagrass, cowpea and pearl millet were the most effective for color improvements. Our findings indicate potential feeding regimes to mitigate global economic losses from meat discoloration and suggest the necessity to develop suitable processing strategies to improve the color of beef from grain-fed Bos cattle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available