4.5 Article

CERTIFIED DIMENSION REDUCTION IN NONLINEAR BAYESIAN INVERSE PROBLEMS

Journal

MATHEMATICS OF COMPUTATION
Volume 91, Issue 336, Pages 1789-1835

Publisher

AMER MATHEMATICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1090/mcom/3737

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DARPA Enabling Quantification of Uncertainty in Physical Systems (EQUiPS) program
  2. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Directed Research and Development program
  3. Alan Turing Institute under the EPSRC [EP/N510129/1]
  4. Australian Research Council [DP210103092]
  5. School of Mathematics at Monash University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a dimension reduction technique for Bayesian inverse problems with nonlinear forward operators, non-Gaussian priors, and non-Gaussian observation noise. The likelihood function is approximated by a ridge function, and the ridge approximation is built by minimizing an upper bound on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the posterior distribution and its approximation. The paper provides an analysis that enables control of the posterior approximation error due to sampling.
We propose a dimension reduction technique for Bayesian inverse problems with nonlinear forward operators, non-Gaussian priors, and nonGaussian observation noise. The likelihood function is approximated by a ridge function, i.e., a map which depends nontrivially only on a few linear combinations of the parameters. We build this ridge approximation by minimizing an upper bound on the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the posterior distribution and its approximation. This bound, obtained via logarithmic Sobolev inequalities, allows one to certify the error of the posterior approximation. Computing the bound requires computing the second moment matrix of the gradient of the log-likelihood function. In practice, a sample-based approximation of the upper bound is then required. We provide an analysis that enables control of the posterior approximation error due to this sampling. Numerical and theoretical comparisons with existing methods illustrate the benefits of the proposed methodology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available