4.6 Article

Reliability modeling and analysis of mixture of exponential distributions using artificial neural network

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mma.8178

Keywords

artificial neural network; mean inactivity time; mean residual life; mean time to failure; reliability function

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, statisticians have shown increasing interest in studying mixture models, particularly in modeling the reliability measures using artificial neural networks. This study analyzes the use of artificial neural networks and mixed model reliability criteria, and develops a multilayer artificial neural network model to estimate reliability parameters.
In recent years, statisticians have become more and more interested in the study of mixture models, especially in the last decade, without adequately considering the difficulty of modeling the reliability measures of mixture models using artificial neural networks. In this study, in which artificial neural networks and mixed model reliability criteria are analyzed, various reliability parameters are calculated considering different scenarios. In order to estimate the obtained numerical reliability parameters, a multilayer artificial neural network model has been developed. Seven different reliability parameter values have been obtained from the artificial neural network model designed with four input parameters. The prediction values obtained from the artificial neural network model developed with five neurons in the hidden layer have been compared with numerical data, and the performance of the model has been analyzed comprehensively. The mean squared error (MSE) value for the network model has been calculated as 1.98E-08 and the R value as 0.99991. The results clearly revealed that the artificial neural network model developed using data from the appropriate statistical model is an excellent tool that can be used to estimate reliability measures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available