4.7 Article

Collapse of helium-filled voids in extreme deformation: Dislocation mechanisms

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.142712

Keywords

Copper alloys; Plasticity; Modelling; simulations

Funding

  1. Science Campaigns
  2. Center for Matter in Extreme Conditions [DE-NA0003842]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) through the Los Alamos National Laboratory
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy [89233218CNA000001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mechanisms responsible for the collapse of helium-filled bubbles during the passage of shock waves in monocrystalline copper are revealed. Both empty and helium-filled bubbles serve as dislocation sources, generating intense, localized plastic regions. There are distinct differences in the collapse of empty voids compared to He-filled bubbles, the former requiring less stress and generating a greater density of dislocations for a given shock strength.
The mechanisms responsible for the collapse of helium-filled bubbles during the passage of shock waves in monocrystalline copper are revealed. Both internal pressure (caused by pre-existing helium atoms) and bubble size are varied in molecular dynamics simulations to understand the atomistic scale deformation as they are subjected to shock compression at pressures of 48, 123, and 170 GPa, corresponding to particle velocities of 1.0, 2.0, and 2.5 km/s. Both empty and helium filled bubbles serve as dislocation sources, generating intense, localized plastic regions. There are distinct differences in the collapse of empty voids compared to He-filled bubbles, the former requiring less stress and generating a greater density of dislocations for a given shock strength. A generalized model for dislocation emission is proposed, where the inclusion of shear stress generated by the helium bubble increases the critical stress to generate dislocations at the defect surface, demonstrating the change in plastic deformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available