4.7 Article

Investigation of the fatigue crack behavior of 304 stainless steels using synchrotron X-ray tomography and diffraction: Influence of the martensite fraction and role of inclusions

Journal

MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
Volume 188, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.matchar.2022.111903

Keywords

Fatigue; 304 stainless steel; Synchrotron; Tomography; Crack propagation

Funding

  1. DOE, Nuclear Engineering University Program (NEUP) Integrated Research Program (IRP) [IRP-15-9318, DE-NE0008442]
  2. FUTURE (Fundamental Understanding of Transport Under Reactor Extremes), Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
  3. DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  4. State of North Carolina
  5. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1542015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of fatigue on the microstructure of three variations of 304 stainless steels was investigated using synchrotron x-ray tomography and diffraction. It was found that fatigue induced the formation of microvoids and cracks, and the chemical nature and shape of precipitates/inclusions played a role in microvoid formation.
The effect of fatigue on the microstructure of four-point bend specimens of three variations of 304 stainless steels (Commercial 304, 304H, and 304 L) was investigated using synchrotron x-ray tomography and diffraction. X-ray tomography revealed the formation of the fatigue-induced microvoids and crack while the diffraction data was used to quantify the amount of deformation-induced martensite found after fatigue in all samples. Transmission electron microscopy evidenced the role of the precipitates/inclusions on the microvoid formation. It was found to depend on their chemical nature. The shape of the precipitates/inclusions was also found to have an effect on the microvoid shape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available